Harding University attracted national media attention last week when it blocked a website created by gay students.

But Harding, affiliated with the churches of Christ and located in Searcy, Ark., isn’t the only Christian university to be confronted with the issue of gay rights in the last few months. Belmont University in December terminated the contract of the head women’s soccer coach, who is a lesbian; last month the university changed its non-discrimination policy to include “sexual orientation” and has officially recognized the first gay student organization.

The issue has prompted discussion of homosexuality, sexual behavior and tolerance among the student body and even in the president’s office at Lipscomb.

“Even though we want to be a Christian university, and we seek to be and we are, that doesn’t mean that topics like [sexuality] are inappropriate,” President Randolph Lowry told Lumination. “In fact, they’re very appropriate. And we believe that, in the context of a faith environment, they must be held.”

Lipscomb’s student handbook points out that sexual contact, including but not restricted to intercourse, between students is a moral violation and is subject to discipline.

Lowry emphasized that this code applies to any behavior—heterosexual or homosexual—and that all sexual contact outside the marriage relationship of husband and wife is “inappropriate and inconsistent with the community we seek to be.”

The president said he does not foresee a change in policy but expects that the university will continue “being gracious, being in conversation, being of help and assistance.”

Patrick McAnally, a law, justice and society major, said he thinks dialogue about the topic is one benefit of the Harding controversy.

“I think that what is happening at Harding is a great thing,” said McAnally. “I think first and foremost as a Christian community, we should be welcoming all people no matter what. As institutions of higher learning, I think it’s very critical that we promote dialogue on every subject.”

Prohibition of dialogue is what caused the stir at Harding last Wednesday, when the university blocked a new website created by a group called HU Queer Press. The administration at Harding said the site had been blocked because it did not comply with rules in the student handbook.

The site, which details the struggles of several gay students, states its purpose is to “bring attention to the lives and issues of demoralized minorities.”

HU Queer Press also distributed physical copies of the publication to nearly one third of the campus, which has about 6,800 students total.

Sarah Kyle, a senior at Harding and editor of the university’s student news site The Link, said she thinks most of the student body responded positively.

“I feel like all in all people were pretty supportive,” she said. “They love the people, and they understand that they’ve gone through a lot of pain.”

Kyle said that some of the attitudes from HU Queer Press seemed to be promoting conversation while others simply seemed angry. She noted that some gay students on campus don’t agree with the views expressed on the site. “They don’t feel like they’re being neglected,” Kyle said. “They don’t feel like they’re being abused.”

After denying access to the site a few hours after it was launched, the university issued a statement explaining that they blocked it because of a policy against sexual conduct, not because it contained homosexual content. The administration also stated that the students had not followed university rules about producing and distributing publications.

Kyle said students have created underground publications in the past, but HU Queer Press is different. “Never before has it come from students this strongly or this organized,” she said. “This is the first real student-led effort to promote understanding about it.”

According to Kyle, the students behind HU Queer Press have taken a step back and are allowing their audience to process what has been said.

Lipscomb student response

Members of Lipscomb’s Student Government Association said they have heard several students here talking about Harding’s situation.

Jackson Sprayberry, a senior in political science and SGA president, said most of the students he has spoken with seem supportive of HU Queer Press’ attempt to initiate dialogue.

“It’s refreshing to see them have courage,” he said of HU Queer Press. “It’s good to know that we’re moving in that direction to where people can be open to who they are.”

Amy Estepp, a junior in public relations, said she thinks this issue very clearly applies to Lipscomb.

“It’s not so much about Harding and their story but about gay rights, especially in a more conservative setting,” she said. “It kind of just gets pushed under the rug, but it’s something that‘s very real.”

Estepp, who is from Kingsport, Tenn., said she thinks the staff and students at Lipscomb try to be welcoming but that gay students still feel left out. She said this is because of the history of condemnation that has surrounded homosexuality in the past.

“I think that people do feel ostracized, especially the gay community because it’s a very in-your-face topic, and it’s very close to people’s hearts,” she said. “There’s just a lot more emotion that goes into it.”

Sprayberry, originally from Chickamauga, Ga., said he doesn’t think bullying or violence toward gays would happen on Lipscomb’s campus.

“I don’t have any friends or know of any administrators who would bully homosexuals,” Sprayberry said, adding that he hears growing numbers of students criticize friends who make gay jokes.

Lipscomb’s current policy

Estepp said she is aware of Lipscomb’s student handbook policy and thinks the university may soon need to address the topic of homosexuality.

“The administration has done a good job of vocalizing issues,” she said. “I think the issue of homosexuality and gay rights is something that will be the next topic of discussion.”

Page 18 of the student handbook lists Lipscomb’s policy on sexual conduct: “All students should practice the highest standards of modesty and sexual morality. Sexual immorality of any kind including homosexual behavior, whether intercourse is or is not involved, will be subject to discipline. Spending the night with a member(s) of the opposite sex, and/or being in any state of undress with members of the opposite sex- even if acts of sexual immorality have not occurred- are also actionable offense.”

McAnally, a senior from Decatur, Ala., said he doesn’t think Lipscomb will condone homosexuality, but he said that a change in policies might help the university seem more welcoming.

In regard to the university’s statement of non-discrimination, McAnally said, “With the amount of things Lipscomb does and being in a city like Nashville, I think we’re going to have to make that policy include homosexuality.”

Lowry said that addressing homosexuality is a matter of respect and that the university will not permit intolerance.

“The university, as part of recognizing that everyone is God’s creation, will not tolerate bullying and harassment,” Lowry said. “That’s simply inappropriate, and we will respond as we learn about it. We will respond swiftly.”

Click here for the Full length interview with Dr. Lowry, produced by Ryan Malone.

Share This